Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moghaddam Mehdi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5. Creator was a crosswiki sockmaster. Mz7 (talk) 19:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moghaddam Mehdi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. The article is filled with primary sources. A Google search of him doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Cbl62. Meets WP:GNG. Hi I searched this person is famous for these links. 1. IMDb 2. Discogs 3. Musicbrianz 4. Sourehcinema Lokal viyt (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not seeing where Cbl62 has opined on this article. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lacks coverage in reliable independant sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Decent amount of coverage about the subject herself including. 1.2.3.4.5.Amir.we1 (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- they are primary sources and not independent of him. I don't think any of the article's sources comes close to the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject that we need to establish Moghaddam Mehdi's notability. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing for this article falls well short of what is needed to pass WP:GNG and doesn't pass WP:NACTOR. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete in violation of TOU by an xwiki spammer/hoaxer. Praxidicae (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.